A good one from the Agitator

From this Ron Paul post

So here's my question: Why do candidates who propose abolishing federal agencies get painted as fringe wackjobs, while candidates who propose we create multiple new ones are viewed as inspiring visionaries?

Candidate A says, "This cabinet-level federal agency isn't working, and hasn't in the 30 years of its existence, despite an ever-increasing budget. Let's abolish it and save the taxpayers money." Candidate B says, "This cabinet-level federal agency isn't working, and hasn't in the 30 years of its existence, despite an ever-increasing budget. Let's spend more money on it!"